Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12586.940430092@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? (Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk> writes: > Just a thought: How does this affect anything placed in the contrib > directory? If someone writes a tool under the GPL, can it be included > under the src/contrib directory, or would we fall foul just because it's > included with our source? Good question. The GPL contains a clause to the effect that "mere aggregation" of a GPL'd piece of code in a source distribution with unrelated pieces of code is OK, even if those other pieces of code are not GPL'd. But the contrib directory is not exactly unrelated to the main Postgres distribution, so I'm not sure that we can point to this clause to justify putting a GPL'd program in contrib. It'd be a gray area... I'd be inclined to say "if you want to put your tool under GPL, fine, but then distributing it is up to you". We don't need to be taking any legal risks on this point. A safe policy is that everything distributed by the Postgres group has to carry the same BSD license. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: