Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion

On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > It's time to re-implement sequences! When they were implemented
> > ~ 1.5 year ago there was no GRANT/REVOKE on VIEWs and so
> > I had to create table for each sequence.
> > There should be one system table - pg_sequence. One record
> > for each sequence will be inserted into this table and
> > one VIEW will be created: 
> 
> I thought you wanted a single table to prevent concurrent access/update
> contension?
let's revise what vadim stated *grin*
"we should re-implement sequences for v6.5, since row-level
locking will exist at that time"? *rofl*

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org