Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion

> On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > > It's time to re-implement sequences! When they were implemented
> > > ~ 1.5 year ago there was no GRANT/REVOKE on VIEWs and so
> > > I had to create table for each sequence.
> > > There should be one system table - pg_sequence. One record
> > > for each sequence will be inserted into this table and
> > > one VIEW will be created: 
> > 
> > I thought you wanted a single table to prevent concurrent access/update
> > contension?
> 
>     let's revise what vadim stated *grin*
> 
>     "we should re-implement sequences for v6.5, since row-level
> locking will exist at that time"? *rofl*

Oh, now I understand.  :-)  Vadim, don't be so modest.  :-)

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026