Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9811141019460.337-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > >Current FE/BE protocol seems pretty optimized to me, but you should know > > >the best. Seems like a waste to try and get it to match some standard, > > > > Well, I suppose you could make the same argument about SQL-92 compliance. > > > > Standards compliance is useful because it plugs you into the positive- > > feedback cycle of product development. Your product works with more > > products, more people use your product, more products are developed which > > work with your product, etc. > > Not really the same. There are end-user visible changes, and > developer-visible changes. From how things sound, I think that implementing Corba will be the trigger for 7.0...:) Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: