Re: BUG #17967: [msvc-x86] Failed to build with error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __BitScanReverse64 referen
От | Mo Youmiu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17967: [msvc-x86] Failed to build with error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __BitScanReverse64 referen |
Дата | |
Msg-id | PSBPR01MB36080F188B2402AF683D9E64CC50A@PSBPR01MB3608.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17967: [msvc-x86] Failed to build with error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __BitScanReverse64 referen (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17967: [msvc-x86] Failed to build with error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __BitScanReverse64 referen
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks for your replies and corrections, and apologies for the confusing version I mentioned.
Mo
For this commit, PostgreSQL was successfully built with msvc on both x86 and amd64.
Glad my report was helpful.
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 6:18
To: moyoumiu@outlook.com <moyoumiu@outlook.com>; pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17967: [msvc-x86] Failed to build with error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __BitScanReverse64 referen
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 6:18
To: moyoumiu@outlook.com <moyoumiu@outlook.com>; pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17967: [msvc-x86] Failed to build with error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __BitScanReverse64 referen
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 01:00, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've not tested it, but I imagine the attached patch should fix it.
I've just pushed that patch to master only.
I noticed your report mentioned that this was for version 15.3. I
assumed this was a mistake as I didn't see any usage of the bit
scanning functions in v15. Commit 677319746 [1] introduced these,
which is new to v16.
Many thanks for reporting this!
David
[1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=677319746
> I've not tested it, but I imagine the attached patch should fix it.
I've just pushed that patch to master only.
I noticed your report mentioned that this was for version 15.3. I
assumed this was a mistake as I didn't see any usage of the bit
scanning functions in v15. Commit 677319746 [1] introduced these,
which is new to v16.
Many thanks for reporting this!
David
[1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=677319746
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: