On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 23:30, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:44 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 22:37, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:25 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I try to set idle_in_transaction_session_timeout after begin transaction,
>> >> it changes immediately, so I think transaction_timeout should also be take
>> >> immediately.
>> >
>> > Ah, right, idle_in_transaction_session_timeout is set after the set
>> > command finishes and before the backend send *ready for query*
>> > to the client, so the value of the GUC is already set before
>> > next command.
>> >
>>
>> I mean, is it possible to set transaction_timeout before next comand?
>>
> Yeah, it's possible, set transaction_timeout in the when it first
> goes into *idle in transaction* mode, see the attached files.
>
Thanks for updating the patch, LGTM.
--
Regrads,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.