Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
От | Daniel Westermann (DWE) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | GVAP278MB01026C00EA4E25E35062483FD2080@GVAP278MB0102.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Bruce, Tom, On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes: >> >> I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but >> >> seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions? >> >> Have you tested this output back to 9.5? >> >> > I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10. >> >> The patch assumes that parallel query is enabled, which is not true by >> default before v10, so it should certainly not be applied before v10 >> (at least not without significant revisions). Yes, the behavior change was in 10. Before 10 the example is fine, I would not apply that to any prior version, otherwisethe whole example needs to be rewritten. Regards Daniel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: