Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201008195352.GA5062@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wrong example in the bloom documentation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes: > >> I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but > >> seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions? > >> Have you tested this output back to 9.5? > > > I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10. > > The patch assumes that parallel query is enabled, which is not true by > default before v10, so it should certainly not be applied before v10 > (at least not without significant revisions). I think we should just go for simple application cases for this. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: