Re: Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEKDCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I see one unsubstantiated allegation about PG intermixed with a ton > of content-free navel-gazing. Don't waste my time. For instance, when I submitted patches for fulltextindex 7.2 it freely used unchecked sprintf's everywhere. Even now I'm not sure what'll happen if a malicious user really tried to crash it. Anyway, who cares about printfs when stuff like select cash_out(2) is documented? > I have no doubt that some problems remain (cf recent agonizing over > whether there is a buffer overrun problem in the date parser) ... > but unspecific rumors don't help anyone. As always, the best form of > criticism is a diff -c patch. Maybe we could form a bunch of people on this list interested in checking for security issues and fixing them. I'd be in, time be willing... Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: