Re: Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27201.1029125136@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Interesting message about printf()'s in PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > Whilst looking around for some more PostgreSQL related stuff, this > message turned up: > http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/sardonix/2002-February/000051.html I see one unsubstantiated allegation about PG intermixed with a ton of content-free navel-gazing. Don't waste my time. There was some considerable effort awhile back towards eliminating unsafe printfs in favor of snprintfs and similar constructs; I doubt that the comments in that message postdate that effort. I have no doubt that some problems remain (cf recent agonizing over whether there is a buffer overrun problem in the date parser) ... but unspecific rumors don't help anyone. As always, the best form of criticism is a diff -c patch. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: