Re: ODBC constructs
От | Atri Sharma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ODBC constructs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FFB34F28-622B-4C12-A4D7-24B6CAD6073F@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ODBC constructs (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ODBC constructs
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Sent from my iPad On 21-May-2013, at 11:24, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote: > libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue. > > ODBC implements a sort of abstraction. IMHO, its like trying to type with mittens on. > Also,I see no point in working using ODBC with Postgres if you want to work in C,when libpq is available.IMHO,it is like adding an extra layer without any purpose,or I may be wrong here. Also,is it only me,or are we all a bit wary of ODBC? I think JDBC is becoming the standard now(of course,its Java,but asI said, you should use libpq if you want to write native code for Postgres). Regards, Atri
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: