Re: ODBC constructs
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ODBC constructs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 519B0C04.8070102@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ODBC constructs (Dev Kumkar <devdas.kumkar@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ODBC constructs
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/20/2013 10:11 PM, Dev Kumkar wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote:
If you wish to work in C,then,I would suggest libpq.I would wait for more replies on this,as I have little knowledgeabout psqlODBC.Thanks for the comments. Yes objective is to work in C and found libpq useful but am not sure about psqlODBC.It would be really great to get comments from community here regarding comparison between both of them and also performance perspective. Based on my reading so far libpq is good from performance perspective.
libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue.
ODBC implements a sort of abstraction. IMHO, its like trying to type with mittens on.
-- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: