Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin
От | Pavan Deolasee |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | FD21FC80-4C2D-47D8-903D-A2E9AD9C3945@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09-Jun-2011, at 8:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Pavan Deolasee >> <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I am wondering if we shouldn't be asking ourselves a different >>>> question: why is ANALYZE running long enough on your tables for this >>>> to become an issue? How long is it taking? > >>> The log file attached in the first post has the details; it's taking around 5 mins for the accounts table with 50 scalefactor and 50 clients > >> Wow, that's slow. Still, what if the user were doing a transaction of >> comparable size? It's not like ANALYZE is doing a gigantic amount of >> work. > > I wonder what vacuum cost delay settings are in use ... > Default settings with 512Mb shared buffers Thanks. Pavan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: