Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24026.1307631594@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Pavan Deolasee > <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I am wondering if we shouldn't be asking ourselves a different >>> question: why is ANALYZE running long enough on your tables for this >>> to become an issue? �How long is it taking? >> The log file attached in the first post has the details; it's taking around 5 mins for the accounts table with 50 scalefactor and 50 clients > Wow, that's slow. Still, what if the user were doing a transaction of > comparable size? It's not like ANALYZE is doing a gigantic amount of > work. I wonder what vacuum cost delay settings are in use ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: