Re: How to add built-in func?
| От | jacktby jacktby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How to add built-in func? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | F9C066D6-A0F4-4F4A-A373-227BD17306BE@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: How to add built-in func? (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 2023年9月12日 00:34,Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> 写道: > > On 2023-09-11 12:28, jacktby jacktby wrote: >>> 2023年9月11日 23:51,Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> 写道: >>> often better) add a corresponding extension to /contrib/. You can find >>> a complete example here [1] for instance, see v4-0001 patch and the >>> function pg_get_relation_publishing_info(). Make sure it has a proper >>> volatility [2]. The patch [3] shows how to add an extension. >>> [1]: https://postgr.es/m/CAAWbhmjcnoV7Xu6LHr_hxqWmVtehv404bvDye%2BQZcUDSg8NSKw%40mail.gmail.com >>> [2]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/xfunc-volatility.html >>> [3]: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TMSat6qjPrrrK0tRTgZsdXwFAbkDn5gjeDtFnUFrjZX-g%40mail.gmail.com >>> -- >> I need to make it used for a new operator in my pg. > > You can implement both a function and an operator (and all that goes with) > in an extension, without having to hack at all on PostgreSQL itself. > You can then, if it seems generally useful enough, offer that extension > to go in contrib/. If it's agreed to be something everyone should have, > it could then make its way into core. > > Do you have it working as an extension yet? That can be a good way > to start, separating the difficulties you have to solve from the ones > you don't have to solve yet. > > Regards, > -Chap I solved it , but I need to use it in my new grammar, so I have to add in into core. That’s necessary. Thanks. But My ownstorage engine is implemented by extension. Extension is a good idea and I’m using it now.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: