Re: [SQL] Unanswered Questions WAS: An unresolved performance problem.
От | Randall Lucas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] Unanswered Questions WAS: An unresolved performance problem. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F73D918C-80E6-11D7-A71E-000A957653D6@tercent.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unanswered Questions WAS: An unresolved performance problem. (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [SQL] Unanswered Questions WAS: An unresolved performance problem.
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Folks, I suspect that a good number of fairly simple questions aren't being answered because they're either misdirected or because the poster hasn't included an "answerable" question (one with sufficient information to answer). A suggestion to partially counter this, at least for "slow query" type questions, has been put forth. If we make it a social norm on the pg-lists in general to reply off-list to inadequately descriptive "slow query" questions with a canned message of helpful guidance, we may be able to up the level of "answerability" of most questions. Ideally, this would make the questions more transparent, so that more responses can come from folks other than the major contributors. Thoughts? Josh and I have placed a draft at http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/SlowQueryPostingGuidelines I'd specifically like to hear whether people would suggest more of an emphasis on heuristics for self-help in such a message, what other info should be included in a "good" slow query question, and people's thoughts on the netiquette of the whole idea. Best, Randall On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 12:57 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Gaetano, > >> I seen around a lot of questions are remaining without any reply, >> may be in this period the guys like Tom Lane are too busy. > > Yes, they are. Currently the major contributors are working hard to > shape up > both 7.3.3. and 7.4 (and having a long-running discussion about the > due date > for 7.4), so they don't have much time for questions. > > And for my part, I'm too busy with my paying job to answer all the > questions > that get posted, as I suspect are Stephan and Bruno and several other > people > who field newbie questions. Given the flood of requests, I have to > prioritize ... and a question which is missing several crucial details > (like > a copy of the query!!!) is going to get answered way later than a > question > which provides all the needed information -- if at all. > > -- > -Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to > majordomo@postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: