Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F1AED4D9-A3E5-41D4-9F72-5624FBC428B9@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On March 21, 2016 5:12:38 AM GMT+01:00, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >The article pointed by you justifies that the way ResetEvent is done by >patch is correct. I am not sure, but you can weigh, if there is a need >of >comment so that if we want enhance this part of code (or want to write >something similar) in future, we don't need to rediscover this fact. I've added a reference in a comment. Did you have a chance of running the patched versions on windows? I plan to push this sometime today, so I can get on to some performance patches I was planning to look into committing. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: