Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1K_p8ihzvRR9=Kp+c9mwSJwr41vGq+bHrQ8uCkVKkm5gw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On March 21, 2016 5:12:38 AM GMT+01:00, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>The article pointed by you justifies that the way ResetEvent is done by
>patch is correct. I am not sure, but you can weigh, if there is a need
>of
>comment so that if we want enhance this part of code (or want to write
>something similar) in future, we don't need to rediscover this fact.
I've added a reference in a comment.
Did you have a chance of running the patched versions on windows?
I am planning to do it in next few hours.
I plan to push this sometime today, so I can get on to some performance patches I was planning to look into committing.
have we done testing to ensure that it actually mitigate the impact of performance degradation due to commit ac1d794. I wanted to do that, but unfortunately the hight-end m/c on which this problem is reproducible is down.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: