Re: TCP Wrappers
| От | Lou Picciano |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TCP Wrappers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | EFC35422-2227-4C0F-8DB1-6357ACBB2FB4@comcast.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TCP Wrappers (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yeah, why bother. Even ’native’ encryption/SSL in PG (were one to use it ‘natively’, as we do) is so good; adding yet another layer seems overkill…
Lou Picciano
On Oct 9, 2019, at 6:39 PM, Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:56 PM Timmy Siu <timmy.siu@aol.com> wrote:Dear all postgresql developers,
I have tested postgres v11 against TCP Wrappers but it does not respond
to TCP wrappers port blocking.
May I suggest the community to have postgres to work with TCP wrappers.??
Its security will be better.The last stable release of TCP Wrappers was a couple decades ago. It's deprecated in RHEL7 and removed in RHEL8. I'm not a PG core member or anything but rather doubt that's an area where the developers will want to expend effort.Cheers,Steve
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: