Re: automake
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: automake |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7DF3D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | automake (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: automake
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: automake > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > >>Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39 > >>To: Dave Page > >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers > >>Subject: Re: automake > >> > >>Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a > >>missing separator > >>in line 377. > >> > >>automake-1.9 will claim that *.m4 is created by aclocal-1.4, but > >>aclocal-1.9 will have throw warnings and automake-1.9 will > fail then. > >>If 1.9 is needed, it should be called explicitely in bootstrap, no? > > > > > > Eh? Do you have both installed in different locations or something? > No, /usr/bin. > All versions are present, but ./bootstrap relies on > aclocal/autoconf to > point to the right versions. > > currently, aclocal-1.4 will run (without problem), but > automake-1.9 will > claim aclocal version and configure isn't created. aclocal-1.9 won't > run, many errors. Is this OK now (following an svn update)? Regards, Dave
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: