Re: Ready to launch?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ready to launch? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4528021@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Ready to launch? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ready to launch?
Re: Ready to launch? |
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: 20 December 2004 16:07 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Ready to launch? > > I like that idea, maybe oscillate between surveys / quotes > for 3 weeks / > 1 week of every month? Sounds good to me. > As for rolling up, I think we still have a few things that should be > addressed: > > > 5) Documentation->FAQ seems fairly busted. Since we have all of the > language FAQ's working on the current site, I think this needs to be > straightened out before we go live. They should be there - the links just need fixing. The problem is that these are extracted automatically from CVS, so integrating them into the site properly as the note on that page suggests is not particularly easy. > 11) Should the license link in the footer point to the license of the > website? Using Omar's reasoning for removing my Privacy Policy link from the About section (ie. It's to do with the site, not the product), I would say that the Licence link from the bottom of each page should go altogether. That said, the site code is also under the BSD licence (albeit the standard one, not the PG version) - but does anyone really care about that? {erhaps it's best left on Gborg. Which reminds me of a problem - *all* the website in CVS is published under the BSD licence, however that includes the elephant which Emily pointed out was a $100 stock photo. Technically that means we cannot use the elephant... > 12) Anyone else have an issue with the footer links sometimes > overlapping the sponser add? I get this alot in the community > section of > the website. My brother pointed that out the other day. He's a web developer by trade so has a bunch of browsers to hand, and determined that of those he had, only Firefox 0.9 seemed to be affected. 1.0 seems to be fine (that's what I run). Does that tie in with your system? WRT the other items, are they on the todo? Can you add them and mark the showstoppers if not please? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: