Re: [PATCH] Have configure complain about unknown options
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Have configure complain about unknown options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401387F15@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] Have configure complain about unknown options (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Have configure complain about unknown options
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-patches-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marko Kreen > Sent: 05 May 2006 12:22 > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Have configure complain about > unknown options > > As PostgreSQL tree is not set up that way, I think for > clarity sake it would be better to give explicit errors for > unknown options. > I'm not in a position to argue about why autoconf works this way, but I can say that I'd like to see unsupported options rejected if there is a sensible way to do it. I've been bitten more than once by mistakenly using --enable-foo rather than --with-foo, or just plain mis-typing. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: