Re: [PATCH] Have configure complain about unknown options

I am thinking we would need an option at the start like --strict that
would throw an error for any later invalid options.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-patches-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marko Kreen
> > Sent: 05 May 2006 12:22
> > To: Tom Lane
> > Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Have configure complain about
> > unknown options
> >
> > As PostgreSQL tree is not set up that way, I think for
> > clarity sake it would be better to give explicit errors for
> > unknown options.
> >
>
> I'm not in a position to argue about why autoconf works this way, but I
> can say that I'd like to see unsupported options rejected if there is a
> sensible way to do it. I've been bitten more than once by mistakenly
> using --enable-foo rather than --with-foo, or just plain mis-typing.
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
>

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +