Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
| От | Mark Dilger |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | E504A3AD-8A5F-4F54-A769-F0D3FF13F129@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sep 11, 2020, at 12:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:23 PM Mark Dilger > <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Another option would be to have pg_dump take a strictness mode option. I don't think the option should have anythingto do with postfix operators specifically, but be more general like --dump-incompatible-objects vs. --omit-incompatible-objectsvs. --error-on-incompatible-objects vs. --do-your-best-to-fixup-incompatible-objects, with oneof those being the default (and with all of them having better names). If --error-on-incompatible-objects were the default,that would behave as Robert recommended upthread. >> >> I can totally see an objection to the added complexity of such options, so I'm really just putting this out on the listfor comment. > > I'm not opposed to Tom's proposal. I just wanted to raise the issue > for discussion. Ah, ok. I don't feel any need for changes, either. I'll leave the patch as it stands now. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: