Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZgxFYL-7SdJr3bMnJg-Bxras-JHedh6dOt4A6JOtusww@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > After re-reading the description of pg_get_keywords, I was reminded that > what it outputs now is intended to provide both a machine-friendly > description of the keyword category ("catcode") and a human-friendly > description ("catdesc"). So we really should do likewise for the > label property. What I now propose is to add two output columns: > > barelabel bool (t or f, obviously) > baredesc text ("can be bare label" or "requires AS", possibly localized) That might be over-engineered in a vacuum, but it seems like it may be cleaner to stick with the existing precedent than to diverge from it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: