Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobF1RNHS4dDDJXpVVwAO3MGaWjVsmP+Yqc7pt7VmaEcQg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:23 PM Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Another option would be to have pg_dump take a strictness mode option. I don't think the option should have anything todo with postfix operators specifically, but be more general like --dump-incompatible-objects vs. --omit-incompatible-objectsvs. --error-on-incompatible-objects vs. --do-your-best-to-fixup-incompatible-objects, with oneof those being the default (and with all of them having better names). If --error-on-incompatible-objects were the default,that would behave as Robert recommended upthread. > > I can totally see an objection to the added complexity of such options, so I'm really just putting this out on the listfor comment. I'm not opposed to Tom's proposal. I just wanted to raise the issue for discussion. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: