Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BDBD7A4E-C176-4F88-90D4-05C75DD7D446@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? (John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Aug 24, 2020, at 12:28 AM, John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:03 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> What are the thoughts about then marking the postfix operator deprecated >>> and eventually removing it? >> >> If we do this it'd require a plan. We'd have to also warn about the >> feature deprecation in (at least) the CREATE OPERATOR man page, and >> we'd have to decide how many release cycles the deprecation notices >> need to stand for. >> >> If that's the intention, though, it'd be good to get those deprecation >> notices published in v13 not v14. > > I imagine the release candidates are not too far away by now, and if > we are confident enough in the direction the patches in this thread > are going, we should probably consider a deprecation notice soon. If so, we might want to also update the deprecation warning for the prefix !! operator in pg_operator.dat: { oid => '389', descr => 'deprecated, use ! instead', oprname => '!!', oprkind => 'l', oprleft => '0', oprright => 'int8', oprresult => 'numeric', oprcode => 'numeric_fac' }, That will be the only remaining factorial operator if we remove postfix operators. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: