Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
От | Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579014DB7DB@m0143.s-mxs.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > What bothers me about what we have now is that we have optional > > keywords before and after INDEX, rather than only between > CREATE and INDEX. > > Yeah, putting them both into that space seems consistent to > me, and it will fix the problem of making an omitted index > name look like a valid command. > > I'm not sure I should be opening this can of worms, but do we > want to use a different keyword than CONCURRENTLY to make it > read better there? precedent syntax (Oracle, Informix) uses the keyword ONLINE at the end:CREATE INDEX blabla_x0 ON blabla (a,b) ONLINE; I'd stick with that. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: