Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060825173739.GM14622@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build ("Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD wrote: > > > > What bothers me about what we have now is that we have optional > > > keywords before and after INDEX, rather than only between > > CREATE and INDEX. > > > > Yeah, putting them both into that space seems consistent to > > me, and it will fix the problem of making an omitted index > > name look like a valid command. > > > > I'm not sure I should be opening this can of worms, but do we > > want to use a different keyword than CONCURRENTLY to make it > > read better there? > > precedent syntax (Oracle, Informix) uses the keyword ONLINE at the end: > CREATE INDEX blabla_x0 ON blabla (a,b) ONLINE; That was what the patch originally used, but it was changed because it made difficult for psql to auto-complete that. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: