RE: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration?
От | Stephen Froehlich |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CY4PR0601MB35888F6B902F7265924E477BE5CD9@CY4PR0601MB3588.namprd06.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration? (Pól Ua Laoínecháin <linehanp@tcd.ie>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Yes, I have found that most PostgreSQL workloads do benefit some (like 25% to 30%) from Intel hyperthreading. With 4 threads, I would probably start out at: max_worker_processes = 4 max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 2 max_parallel_workers = 3 max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 1 And then keep an eye on htop ... and go from there. Remember that for this generation of processor, the speculative executionpatches make context switching (changing which software thread a hyperthread is working on) quite expensive, soits bad to max out the processor, and your gains above the 2 cores will be small. But honestly I have never run PostgreSQL on a machine with fewer than 12 cores / 24 threads. --Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Pól Ua Laoínecháin <linehanp@tcd.ie> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 12:16 Cc: pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org> Subject: Re: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration? Hi, and thanks for replying. > Not according to its "about" page... Yeah, sure, it's not a silver bullet, but the thrust of my question was: do the community experts consider it reliable enough as a first approximation? Your remarks about "better than the generic defaults" reassures me that this is the case. This is just my laptop - but I've taken PGTune's recommendations before for a data loading and it was a real help... One other question that I forgot to include in my original! I have a two CPU core (that's why I put 2 for the number of CPUs) but my processor supports hyperthreading (Intel Core i5,7th Gen), so should I really put 4 as the no. Changing this from 2 to 4 changes the work_mem from 41943kB to 20971kB and the worker settings from max_worker_processes = 2 max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 1 max_parallel_workers = 2 max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 1 to max_worker_processes = 4 max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 2 max_parallel_workers = 4 max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 2 So, which would be the correct Number of CPUs setting given my processor? TIA and rgs, Pól... > David J.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: