Re: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration?
От | Pól Ua Laoínecháin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAF4RT5QJ0gAVqqiNJ2-2WMcGVsWhihBwif+zttw08pT-W0jv1w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration? ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Using PGTune - is it a good source for system configuration?
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hi, and thanks for replying. > Not according to its "about" page... Yeah, sure, it's not a silver bullet, but the thrust of my question was: do the community experts consider it reliable enough as a first approximation? Your remarks about "better than the generic defaults" reassures me that this is the case. This is just my laptop - but I've taken PGTune's recommendations before for a data loading and it was a real help... One other question that I forgot to include in my original! I have a two CPU core (that's why I put 2 for the number of CPUs) but my processor supports hyperthreading (Intel Core i5, 7th Gen), so should I really put 4 as the no. Changing this from 2 to 4 changes the work_mem from 41943kB to 20971kB and the worker settings from max_worker_processes = 2 max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 1 max_parallel_workers = 2 max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 1 to max_worker_processes = 4 max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 2 max_parallel_workers = 4 max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 2 So, which would be the correct Number of CPUs setting given my processor? TIA and rgs, Pól... > David J.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: