Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CB10979C-1FB1-42DA-A322-5E8D1541927A@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On September 20, 2017 7:22:00 PM PDT, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Mithun Cy ><mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> My current tests show on scylla (2 socket machine with 28 CPU core) I >> do not see any improvement at all as similar to Jesper. But same >tests >> on power2 (4 sockets) and Cthulhu(8 socket machine) we can see >> improvements. > >OK, makes sense. So for whatever reason, this appears to be something >that will only help users with >2 sockets. But that's not necessarily >a bad thing. Wonder how much of that is microarchitecture, how much number of sockets. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: