Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYuuhFPifAPHBCFz95hANeMHVoRKtpon0sdAOYTJWiaiQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() (Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > My current tests show on scylla (2 socket machine with 28 CPU core) I > do not see any improvement at all as similar to Jesper. But same tests > on power2 (4 sockets) and Cthulhu(8 socket machine) we can see > improvements. OK, makes sense. So for whatever reason, this appears to be something that will only help users with >2 sockets. But that's not necessarily a bad thing. The small regression at 1 client is a bit concerning though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: