Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdsAyaE6AX_n7wE4jfxiO_JoD0+Ne=LGVbx67qZoiYp3zA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2/24/17 16:32, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>     set EXTENDED_DESCRIBE_SORT size_desc
>     \dt+
>     \l+
>     \di+
>
>     Possible variants: schema_table, table_schema, size_desc, size_asc

I can see this being useful, but I think it needs to be organized a
little better.

Sort key and sort direction should be separate settings.
 
I agree.

I'm not sure why we need to have separate settings to sort by schema
name and table name.

I think sorting by schema name, object name makes sense for people, who have objects of same name in different schemas.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: