Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7e0a9c97-d48e-01d5-6437-b275e7dfc594@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describecommands, when size is printed (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed
Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort fordescribe commands, when size is printed |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/24/17 16:32, Pavel Stehule wrote: > set EXTENDED_DESCRIBE_SORT size_desc > \dt+ > \l+ > \di+ > > Possible variants: schema_table, table_schema, size_desc, size_asc I can see this being useful, but I think it needs to be organized a little better. Sort key and sort direction should be separate settings. I'm not sure why we need to have separate settings to sort by schema name and table name. But if we do, then we should support that for all object types. I think maybe that's something we shouldn't get into right now. So I would have one setting for sort key = {name|size} and on for sort direction = {asc|desc}. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: