Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
| От | Vaishnavi Prabakaran |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOoUkxTO+d2riaLgNEuV1o9t1AKGGY-+GpNRwUbFBZwv6toFbA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
I really do not like calling it "commit" as that conflates with a database commit.A batch can embed multiple BEGINs and COMMITs. It's entirely possible for an earlier part of the batch to succeed and commit, then a later part to fail, if that's the case. So that name is IMO wrong.
Ok, SendQueue seems ok to me as well. Will change it in next version.
+"a"?Hmm, Can you explain the question please. I don't understand.s/of new query/of a new query/
Thanks for explaining. Will change this too in next version.
Thanks & Regards,
Vaishnavi,
Fujitsu Australia.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: