Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

> On 13 Sep 2017, at 07:44, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com <mailto:craig@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
>
> I really do not like calling it "commit" as that conflates with a database commit.
>
> A batch can embed multiple BEGINs and COMMITs. It's entirely possible for an earlier part of the batch to succeed and
commit,then a later part to fail, if that's the case. So that name is IMO wrong. 
>
> Ok, SendQueue seems ok to me as well. Will change it in next version.
>
> +"a"?
>
> Hmm, Can you explain the question please. I don't understand.
>
> s/of new query/of a new query/
>
> Thanks for explaining. Will change this too in next version.

Based on the discussions in this thread, and that a new version hasn’t been
submitted, I’m marking this Returned with Feedback.  Please re-submit the new
version in an upcoming commitfest when ready.

cheers ./daniel

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers