Re: progress report for ANALYZE
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: progress report for ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_aW3CTn-LJ9ZPicqWCHEowm0WyLnQoShLiiTLgtj3Ba0A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: progress report for ANALYZE (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: progress report for ANALYZE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:44 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I got the impression that that was determined to be the desirable > > behavior, so I made it do that, but I'm not really happy about it > > either. We're not too late to change the CREATE INDEX behavior, but > > let's discuss what is it that we want. > > I don't think I intended to make any such determination -- which > commit do you think established this as the canonical behavior? > > I propose that once a field is set, we should leave it set until the end. +1 Note that this patch is already behaving like that if the table only contains dead rows.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: