Re: progress report for ANALYZE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: progress report for ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob_YTDVU=Z9CmQj6uP6hcuY77Bs1YFT+fy0Ayc6_Qzn1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: progress report for ANALYZE (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Re: progress report for ANALYZE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Yeah, I got the impression that that was determined to be the desirable > behavior, so I made it do that, but I'm not really happy about it > either. We're not too late to change the CREATE INDEX behavior, but > let's discuss what is it that we want. I don't think I intended to make any such determination -- which commit do you think established this as the canonical behavior? I propose that once a field is set, we should leave it set until the end. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: