Hello.
Andrey, Tels - thanks for review.
> It could be named "SkipTuples" (e.g. this is the number of tuples we need
> to skip, not the number we have skipped), and the other one then
> "iss_SkipTuplesRemaining" so they are consistent with each other.
Agreed, done.
> Also, I think that this check could be removed from loop. We do not expect that it's state will change during execution, do we?
Removed.
Patch is attached, github is updated too.
Michail.