Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
| От | Wayne E. Seguin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANf8RLv=UsHu+0bDS-fLJWhZATeE+hf8rW7DyUF2vbfWuTO_Vg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Thank you everyone for your replies, the thoughts and context are greatly appreciated!
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 13 August 2015 at 23:52, Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The context of this is using BDR to implement a HA solution where we have
> one node getting all connections at a time, if the node fails we move all
> connections to another node. (eg. only one node gets all connections at any
> given time).
This sounds like a job better suited to a normal active/standby
configuration with regular built-in streaming replication. Use a tool
like repmgr to manage failover and a proxy like pgbouncer to redirect
traffic.
There's no reason to use async multi-master replication when simple
single-master replication will do just as well.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: