Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMsr+YHsgrg=nDW5U4wC44Hnc1ns-wXJzU3HgQhsp_jkQqrG7g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 ("Wayne E. Seguin" <wayneeseguin@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 13 August 2015 at 23:52, Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin@gmail.com> wrote: > The context of this is using BDR to implement a HA solution where we have > one node getting all connections at a time, if the node fails we move all > connections to another node. (eg. only one node gets all connections at any > given time). This sounds like a job better suited to a normal active/standby configuration with regular built-in streaming replication. Use a tool like repmgr to manage failover and a proxy like pgbouncer to redirect traffic. There's no reason to use async multi-master replication when simple single-master replication will do just as well. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: