Re:

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 17:08, Holger Jakobs <holger@jakobs.com> wrote:
>
> Am 24. November 2021 18:06:45 MEZ schrieb Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>:
> >On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 14:03, MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> You do understand that multi-master replication is not acid-compliant
> >> and the implications of that, right? It only works well for "read
> >> globally, write locally" scenarios.
> >
> >This isn't true.
> >
> >Async multi-master has performance advantages, but some drawbacks. But
> >systems such as BDR3 allow multiple modes of operation that overcome
> >these perceived issues.
> >
>
> Are you aware that the original poster asked for open source solutions?

Yes, I read that, which is why I didn't reply to the OP.

My response was to the statement about "multi-master replication".

> Of course, BDR3 is a great tool.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/