Re:

Am 24. November 2021 18:06:45 MEZ schrieb Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>:
>On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 14:03, MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com> wrote:
>>
>> You do understand that multi-master replication is not acid-compliant
>> and the implications of that, right? It only works well for "read
>> globally, write locally" scenarios.
>
>This isn't true.
>
>Async multi-master has performance advantages, but some drawbacks. But
>systems such as BDR3 allow multiple modes of operation that overcome
>these perceived issues.
>


Are you aware that the original poster asked for open source solutions?

Of course, BDR3 is a great tool.

--
Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach
+49 178 9759012
- sent from mobile, therefore short -