Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id CANWCAZYzenc5nxx1Wm4dKv9hWbEzsge8FX=q-mtHj8NvhSwQww@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL  (JiaoShuntian <jiaoshuntian@highgo.com>)
Ответы Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 3:08 PM JiaoShuntian <jiaoshuntian@highgo.com> wrote:
> I noticed that PostgreSQL currently supports GB18030 encoding based on the older GB18030-2000 standard (as seen in
commitslike extend GB18030 conversion). However, China has since updated its mandatory character set standard to
GB18030-2022,which includes additional characters and stricter compliance requirements.GB18030-2022 is now the official
standardin China, and ensuring PostgreSQL’s full compliance would be beneficial for users in Chinese-speaking regions. 

This is a non-backwards-compatible change:

https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2022/22274-disruptive-changes.pdf
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23003r-gb18030-recommendations.pdf

There is a risk of breaking applications, although only a few dozen
mappings changed. If it were added as a separate encoding, users could
opt in.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: