Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANWCAZYzenc5nxx1Wm4dKv9hWbEzsge8FX=q-mtHj8NvhSwQww@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL (JiaoShuntian <jiaoshuntian@highgo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 3:08 PM JiaoShuntian <jiaoshuntian@highgo.com> wrote: > I noticed that PostgreSQL currently supports GB18030 encoding based on the older GB18030-2000 standard (as seen in commitslike extend GB18030 conversion). However, China has since updated its mandatory character set standard to GB18030-2022,which includes additional characters and stricter compliance requirements.GB18030-2022 is now the official standardin China, and ensuring PostgreSQL’s full compliance would be beneficial for users in Chinese-speaking regions. This is a non-backwards-compatible change: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2022/22274-disruptive-changes.pdf https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23003r-gb18030-recommendations.pdf There is a risk of breaking applications, although only a few dozen mappings changed. If it were added as a separate encoding, users could opt in. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: