Re: PL/java
| От | Hemil Ruparel |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/java |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANW1aT-9E4qQ_1GG0mujYzZeZZZkU5MFs+tkzHXd5UKitpoHbQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/java (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PL/java
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like Java is not meant to interact with databases. Nor is python (in my opinion). I think you should skip the search
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:15 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 12/7/20 3:25 AM, Zé Rui Marques wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the lead architect in a small firm that develops a very specialised
> ETL platform.
>
> Traditionally, we have used Oracle and PL-SQL, and we are now porting
> everything to Postgres.
>
> All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that all of
> our code within the database to be also in java.
>
> The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
>
> I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official
> procedural language. If so, when?
None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today it
would likely a couple of years before it would be included, so that is
not going to help you. What is your concern?
>
> Thanks,
> *—*
> *Zé Rui Marques*
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: