Re: PL/java
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/java |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 300f6bcc-a612-af70-d420-50d034199fb8@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/java (Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2002@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/java
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote: > I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like Java > is not meant to interact with databases. The JDBC folks might disagree. Nor is python (in my opinion). > I think you should skip the search > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:15 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com > <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote: > > On 12/7/20 3:25 AM, Zé Rui Marques wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am the lead architect in a small firm that develops a very > specialised > > ETL platform. > > > > Traditionally, we have used Oracle and PL-SQL, and we are now > porting > > everything to Postgres. > > > > All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that > all of > > our code within the database to be also in java. > > > > The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres. > > > > I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official > > procedural language. If so, when? > > None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today it > would likely a couple of years before it would be included, so that is > not going to help you. What is your concern? > > > > > Thanks, > > *—* > > *Zé Rui Marques* > > > > > > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: