Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes

On 12 December 2016 at 00:36, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Craig Ringer
> <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>>> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this
>>>> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen
>>>> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't
>>>> reach consistency yet.
>>>
>>> Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct.
>>
>> Attached no patch second time?
>
> I see an attachment, and it shows in the archives.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aee1d499-e3ca-e091-56da-1ee6a47741c8%402ndquadrant.com

Sorry for the noise, apparently my phone's mail client was being dense.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training
&Services