Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CACjxUsOtcQe1omhs_qQT_bT=PPj9d65cyb_916yZa=q_50m3bw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> >>> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this >>> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen >>> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't >>> reach consistency yet. >> >> Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct. > > Attached no patch second time? I see an attachment, and it shows in the archives. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aee1d499-e3ca-e091-56da-1ee6a47741c8%402ndquadrant.com -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: