Re: raw output from copy
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: raw output from copy |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YFDByy7uxhPg80UhtV8mvSG9zTNtWKv9MbUbtTifqxWGQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: raw output from copy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: raw output from copy
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 March 2016 at 00:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> I tested COPY RAW on old psql clients - and it is working without any
> problem - so when the client uses same logic as psql, then it should to
> work. Sure, there can be differently implemented clients, but the COPY
> client side is usually simple - store stream to output.
My point is precisely that I doubt all clients are that stupid about COPY.
PgJDBC definitely isn't.
Any changes really need to be tested against PgJDBC's CopyManager.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: